Cambodia vs Grenada: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score

Cambodia
38.33
in 2019
Grenada
35
in 2019
Cambodia rank
158th
Grenada rank
160th

Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time

  • Cambodia
  • Grenada
010203040200520122019

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 38.33 against 35 in Grenada, a difference of 3.33.

That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.1 times Grenada's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.

Cambodia ranks 158th and Grenada ranks 160th of 188 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Grenada Difference Ahead
2000s 40 35 5 Cambodia
2010s 38.67 35 3.67 Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Cambodia or Grenada?
Cambodia, at 38.33 against 35 in Grenada as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Cambodia and Grenada?
3.33, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Grenada?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Cambodia and Grenada rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
Cambodia ranks 158th and Grenada ranks 160th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.