Burkina Faso vs Papua New Guinea: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Burkina Faso
30
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
30
in 2019
Burkina Faso rank
169th
Papua New Guinea rank
169th
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 30 against 30 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 169th and Papua New Guinea ranks 169th of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30 | 51.33 | 21.33 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 29.5 | 48.33 | 18.83 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Burkina Faso or Papua New Guinea?
- Burkina Faso, at 30 against 30 in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Burkina Faso and Papua New Guinea?
- 0, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Papua New Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Burkina Faso and Papua New Guinea rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 169th and Papua New Guinea ranks 169th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.