Burkina Faso vs Equatorial Guinea: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Burkina Faso
30
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea
28.33
in 2019
Burkina Faso rank
169th
Equatorial Guinea rank
171st
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 30 against 28.33 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 1.67.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 169th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 171st of 191 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30 | 28.33 | 1.67 | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 29.5 | 28.33 | 1.17 | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Burkina Faso or Equatorial Guinea?
- Burkina Faso, at 30 against 28.33 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Burkina Faso and Equatorial Guinea?
- 1.67, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Equatorial Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Burkina Faso and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 169th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 171st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.