Benin vs Zimbabwe: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score

Benin
15
in 2019
Zimbabwe
20
in 2019
Benin rank
181st
Zimbabwe rank
178th

Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time

  • Benin
  • Zimbabwe
05101520200520122019

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 20 against 15 in Benin, a difference of 5.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Benin's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Benin ranks 181st and Zimbabwe ranks 178th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Benin averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Benin Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 18.33 17.33 0.9999 Benin
2010s 16.67 20 3.33 Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Benin or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 20 against 15 in Benin as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Benin and Zimbabwe?
5, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Zimbabwe?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Benin and Zimbabwe rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
Benin ranks 181st and Zimbabwe ranks 178th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.