Barbados vs Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Barbados
58.33
in 2019
Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of
56.67
in 2019
Barbados rank
116th
Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of rank
118th
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Barbados
- Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 58.33 against 56.67 in Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of, a difference of 1.66.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 116th and Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of ranks 118th of 190 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Barbados or Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of?
- Barbados, at 58.33 against 56.67 in Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Barbados and Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of?
- 1.66, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Barbados and Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Barbados ranks 116th and Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of ranks 118th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.