Azerbaijan vs Spain: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score

Azerbaijan
90
in 2019
Spain
90
in 2019
Azerbaijan rank
40th
Spain rank
40th

Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Spain
020406080100200520122019

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 90 against 90 in Spain, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Spain ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 40th and Spain ranks 40th of 188 countries.

Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Spain Difference Ahead
2000s 53.33 90.67 37.33 Spain
2010s 86 90.17 4.17 Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Azerbaijan or Spain?
Azerbaijan, at 90 against 90 in Spain as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Azerbaijan and Spain?
0, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Spain?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Azerbaijan and Spain rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
Azerbaijan ranks 40th and Spain ranks 40th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.