Azerbaijan, Republic of vs Jordan: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Azerbaijan, Republic of
90
in 2019
Jordan
90
in 2019
Azerbaijan, Republic of rank
40th
Jordan rank
40th
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Azerbaijan, Republic of
- Jordan
How they compare
Azerbaijan, Republic of currently reports 90 against 90 in Jordan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Jordan ahead.
Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 40th and Jordan ranks 40th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan, Republic of averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan, Republic of | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.33 | 61.67 | 8.33 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 86 | 66.17 | 19.83 | Azerbaijan, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Azerbaijan, Republic of or Jordan?
- Azerbaijan, Republic of, at 90 against 90 in Jordan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Azerbaijan, Republic of and Jordan?
- 0, with Azerbaijan, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan, Republic of and Jordan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Azerbaijan, Republic of and Jordan rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 40th and Jordan ranks 40th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.