Kazakhstan vs Papua New Guinea: Paying taxes: Labor tax and contributions
Kazakhstan
10.1%
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
9.5%
in 2019
Kazakhstan rank
133rd
Papua New Guinea rank
135th
Paying taxes: Labor tax and contributions over time
- Kazakhstan
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 10.1% against 9.5% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.6%.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 133rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 135th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.2% | 11.1% | 5.1% | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 11.1% | 11.5% | 0.4% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: labor tax and contributions, Kazakhstan or Papua New Guinea?
- Kazakhstan, at 10.1% against 9.5% in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: labor tax and contributions between Kazakhstan and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.6%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Papua New Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Kazakhstan and Papua New Guinea rank globally for paying taxes: labor tax and contributions?
- Kazakhstan ranks 133rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 135th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Labor tax and contributions (% of profits). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The labor tax and contributions measures all government mandated labor contributions that are borne by the business in the second year of operation, expressed as a share of commercial pro?t.