Portugal vs Solomon Islands: Paying taxes (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Portugal
83.75
in 2019
Solomon Islands
83.81
in 2019
Portugal rank
42nd
Solomon Islands rank
40th

Paying taxes (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Portugal
  • Solomon Islands
020406080201520172019

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 83.81 against 83.75 in Portugal, a difference of 0.06.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.

Portugal ranks 42nd and Solomon Islands ranks 40th of 188 countries.

Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes (db17-20 methodology) - score, Portugal or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 83.81 against 83.75 in Portugal as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes (db17-20 methodology) - score between Portugal and Solomon Islands?
0.06, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Solomon Islands?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Portugal and Solomon Islands rank globally for paying taxes (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Portugal ranks 42nd and Solomon Islands ranks 40th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for paying taxes is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, the payments, time and total tax and contribution rate for a company to comply with tax laws in an economy, as well as the postfiling procedures to request and process a VAT refund claim and to comply with and complete a corporate income tax correction. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.