New Zealand vs Oman: Paying taxes (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
New Zealand
91.05
in 2019
Oman
90.16
in 2019
New Zealand rank
9th
Oman rank
11th
Paying taxes (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- New Zealand
- Oman
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 91.05 against 90.16 in Oman, a difference of 0.89.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Oman ahead.
New Zealand ranks 9th and Oman ranks 11th of 188 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes (db17-20 methodology) - score, New Zealand or Oman?
- New Zealand, at 91.05 against 90.16 in Oman as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes (db17-20 methodology) - score between New Zealand and Oman?
- 0.89, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Oman?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Oman rank globally for paying taxes (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- New Zealand ranks 9th and Oman ranks 11th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for paying taxes is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, the payments, time and total tax and contribution rate for a company to comply with tax laws in an economy, as well as the postfiling procedures to request and process a VAT refund claim and to comply with and complete a corporate income tax correction. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.