Equatorial Guinea vs Mauritania: Paying taxes (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Paying taxes (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 42.63 against 41.54 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 1.09.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 180th and Mauritania ranks 178th of 191 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes (db17-20 methodology) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 42.63 against 41.54 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes (db17-20 methodology) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Mauritania?
- 1.09, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Mauritania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Mauritania rank globally for paying taxes (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 180th and Mauritania ranks 178th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for paying taxes is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, the payments, time and total tax and contribution rate for a company to comply with tax laws in an economy, as well as the postfiling procedures to request and process a VAT refund claim and to comply with and complete a corporate income tax correction. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.