China vs Suriname: Paying taxes (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
China
70.06
in 2019
Suriname
69.44
in 2019
China rank
104th
Suriname rank
106th
Paying taxes (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- China
- Suriname
How they compare
China currently reports 70.06 against 69.44 in Suriname, a difference of 0.62.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Suriname ahead.
China ranks 104th and Suriname ranks 106th of 188 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes (db17-20 methodology) - score, China or Suriname?
- China, at 70.06 against 69.44 in Suriname as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes (db17-20 methodology) - score between China and Suriname?
- 0.62, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Suriname?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do China and Suriname rank globally for paying taxes (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- China ranks 104th and Suriname ranks 106th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for paying taxes is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, the payments, time and total tax and contribution rate for a company to comply with tax laws in an economy, as well as the postfiling procedures to request and process a VAT refund claim and to comply with and complete a corporate income tax correction. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.