Cameroon vs Equatorial Guinea: Paying taxes (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Cameroon
36.34
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea
41.54
in 2019
Cameroon rank
179th
Equatorial Guinea rank
177th

Paying taxes (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Cameroon
  • Equatorial Guinea
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 41.54 against 36.34 in Cameroon, a difference of 5.2.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Cameroon's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Cameroon ranks 179th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 177th of 188 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes (db17-20 methodology) - score, Cameroon or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 41.54 against 36.34 in Cameroon as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes (db17-20 methodology) - score between Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea?
5.2, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for paying taxes (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Cameroon ranks 179th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 177th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for paying taxes is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, the payments, time and total tax and contribution rate for a company to comply with tax laws in an economy, as well as the postfiling procedures to request and process a VAT refund claim and to comply with and complete a corporate income tax correction. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.