Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sri Lanka: Paying taxes (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Paying taxes (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 60.43 against 59.78 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.65.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 142nd and Sri Lanka ranks 143rd of 191 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes (db17-20 methodology) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Sri Lanka?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 60.43 against 59.78 in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes (db17-20 methodology) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sri Lanka?
- 0.65, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sri Lanka?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sri Lanka rank globally for paying taxes (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 142nd and Sri Lanka ranks 143rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for paying taxes is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, the payments, time and total tax and contribution rate for a company to comply with tax laws in an economy, as well as the postfiling procedures to request and process a VAT refund claim and to comply with and complete a corporate income tax correction. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.