Sierra Leone vs Uruguay: Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score

Sierra Leone
65.8
in 2015
Uruguay
65.25
in 2015
Sierra Leone rank
122nd
Uruguay rank
124th

Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score over time

  • Sierra Leone
  • Uruguay
0204060200520102015

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 65.8 against 65.25 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.55.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sierra Leone ahead.

Sierra Leone ranks 122nd and Uruguay ranks 124th of 183 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Sierra Leone averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sierra Leone Uruguay Difference Ahead
2000s 35.45 40.83 5.38 Uruguay
2010s 61.02 58.9 2.11 Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score, Sierra Leone or Uruguay?
Sierra Leone, at 65.8 against 65.25 in Uruguay as of 2015.
What is the difference in paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score between Sierra Leone and Uruguay?
0.55, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Uruguay?
11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
How do Sierra Leone and Uruguay rank globally for paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score?
Sierra Leone ranks 122nd and Uruguay ranks 124th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
185 places, 2,006 data points, 2005–2015
Last refreshed

The score for paying taxes is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, the payments, time and total tax and contribution rate for a company to comply with tax laws in an economy. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-16 studies.