Lithuania vs Seychelles: Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score

Lithuania
81.42
in 2015
Seychelles
81.82
in 2015
Lithuania rank
45th
Seychelles rank
42nd

Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score over time

  • Lithuania
  • Seychelles
020406080200520102015

How they compare

Seychelles currently reports 81.82 against 81.42 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.4.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 45th and Seychelles ranks 42nd of 183 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Seychelles in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Seychelles Difference Ahead
2000s 79.24 75.04 4.2 Lithuania
2010s 80.99 82.47 1.48 Seychelles

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score, Lithuania or Seychelles?
Seychelles, at 81.82 against 81.42 in Lithuania as of 2015.
What is the difference in paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score between Lithuania and Seychelles?
0.4, with Seychelles ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Seychelles?
11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
How do Lithuania and Seychelles rank globally for paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score?
Lithuania ranks 45th and Seychelles ranks 42nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
185 places, 2,006 data points, 2005–2015
Last refreshed

The score for paying taxes is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, the payments, time and total tax and contribution rate for a company to comply with tax laws in an economy. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-16 studies.