Latvia vs Netherlands: Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score

Latvia
85.75
in 2015
Netherlands
85.96
in 2015
Latvia rank
29th
Netherlands rank
27th

Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score over time

  • Latvia
  • Netherlands
020406080200520102015

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 85.96 against 85.75 in Latvia, a difference of 0.21.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Netherlands ahead.

Latvia ranks 29th and Netherlands ranks 27th of 183 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Netherlands Difference Ahead
2000s 79.78 78.55 1.23 Latvia
2010s 84.16 86.45 2.3 Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score, Latvia or Netherlands?
Netherlands, at 85.96 against 85.75 in Latvia as of 2015.
What is the difference in paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score between Latvia and Netherlands?
0.21, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Netherlands?
11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
How do Latvia and Netherlands rank globally for paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score?
Latvia ranks 29th and Netherlands ranks 27th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
185 places, 2,006 data points, 2005–2015
Last refreshed

The score for paying taxes is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, the payments, time and total tax and contribution rate for a company to comply with tax laws in an economy. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-16 studies.