Lao PDR vs Sierra Leone: Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score

Lao PDR
66.1
in 2015
Sierra Leone
65.8
in 2015
Lao PDR rank
121st
Sierra Leone rank
122nd

Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score over time

  • Lao PDR
  • Sierra Leone
0204060200520102015

How they compare

Lao PDR currently reports 66.1 against 65.8 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.3.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Lao PDR ahead.

Lao PDR ranks 121st and Sierra Leone ranks 122nd of 183 countries.

Lao PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lao PDR Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
2000s 51.29 35.45 15.84 Lao PDR
2010s 65.22 61.02 4.2 Lao PDR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score, Lao PDR or Sierra Leone?
Lao PDR, at 66.1 against 65.8 in Sierra Leone as of 2015.
What is the difference in paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score between Lao PDR and Sierra Leone?
0.3, with Lao PDR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao PDR and Sierra Leone?
11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
How do Lao PDR and Sierra Leone rank globally for paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score?
Lao PDR ranks 121st and Sierra Leone ranks 122nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
185 places, 2,006 data points, 2005–2015
Last refreshed

The score for paying taxes is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, the payments, time and total tax and contribution rate for a company to comply with tax laws in an economy. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-16 studies.