Kiribati vs East Timor: Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score
Kiribati
87.51
in 2015
East Timor
86.15
in 2015
Kiribati rank
23rd
East Timor rank
26th
Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score over time
- Kiribati
- East Timor
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 87.51 against 86.15 in East Timor, a difference of 1.36.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 23rd and East Timor ranks 26th of 183 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.46 | 61 | 30.46 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 90.66 | 88.38 | 2.28 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score, Kiribati or East Timor?
- Kiribati, at 87.51 against 86.15 in East Timor as of 2015.
- What is the difference in paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score between Kiribati and East Timor?
- 1.36, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and East Timor?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
- How do Kiribati and East Timor rank globally for paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score?
- Kiribati ranks 23rd and East Timor ranks 26th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for paying taxes is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, the payments, time and total tax and contribution rate for a company to comply with tax laws in an economy. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-16 studies.