Kiribati vs New Zealand: Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score
Kiribati
87.51
in 2015
New Zealand
88.06
in 2015
Kiribati rank
23rd
New Zealand rank
22nd
Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score over time
- Kiribati
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 88.06 against 87.51 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.55.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 23rd and New Zealand ranks 22nd of 185 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.46 | 86.56 | 4.9 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 90.66 | 87.71 | 2.95 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score, Kiribati or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 88.06 against 87.51 in Kiribati as of 2015.
- What is the difference in paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score between Kiribati and New Zealand?
- 0.55, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and New Zealand?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
- How do Kiribati and New Zealand rank globally for paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score?
- Kiribati ranks 23rd and New Zealand ranks 22nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for paying taxes is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, the payments, time and total tax and contribution rate for a company to comply with tax laws in an economy. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-16 studies.