Kiribati vs Luxembourg: Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score

Kiribati
87.51
in 2015
Luxembourg
88.58
in 2015
Kiribati rank
23rd
Luxembourg rank
21st

Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score over time

  • Kiribati
  • Luxembourg
020406080100200520102015

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 88.58 against 87.51 in Kiribati, a difference of 1.07.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kiribati ahead.

Kiribati ranks 23rd and Luxembourg ranks 21st of 183 countries.

Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 91.46 88.37 3.09 Kiribati
2010s 90.66 88.48 2.18 Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score, Kiribati or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 88.58 against 87.51 in Kiribati as of 2015.
What is the difference in paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score between Kiribati and Luxembourg?
1.07, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Luxembourg?
10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2015.
How do Kiribati and Luxembourg rank globally for paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score?
Kiribati ranks 23rd and Luxembourg ranks 21st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
185 places, 2,006 data points, 2005–2015
Last refreshed

The score for paying taxes is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, the payments, time and total tax and contribution rate for a company to comply with tax laws in an economy. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-16 studies.