Kazakhstan vs Kiribati: Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score
Kazakhstan
88.58
in 2015
Kiribati
87.51
in 2015
Kazakhstan rank
20th
Kiribati rank
23rd
Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score over time
- Kazakhstan
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 88.58 against 87.51 in Kiribati, a difference of 1.07.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 20th and Kiribati ranks 23rd of 183 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.29 | 91.46 | 12.17 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 88.54 | 90.66 | 2.12 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score, Kazakhstan or Kiribati?
- Kazakhstan, at 88.58 against 87.51 in Kiribati as of 2015.
- What is the difference in paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score between Kazakhstan and Kiribati?
- 1.07, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kiribati?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
- How do Kazakhstan and Kiribati rank globally for paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score?
- Kazakhstan ranks 20th and Kiribati ranks 23rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for paying taxes is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, the payments, time and total tax and contribution rate for a company to comply with tax laws in an economy. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-16 studies.