Guinea-Bissau vs Tanzania: Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score

Guinea-Bissau
58.13
in 2015
Tanzania
59.04
in 2015
Guinea-Bissau rank
147th
Tanzania rank
145th

Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Tanzania
0204060200520102015

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 59.04 against 58.13 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.91.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 147th and Tanzania ranks 145th of 183 countries.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 57.07 60.31 3.24 Tanzania
2010s 58.03 59.43 1.4 Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score, Guinea-Bissau or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 59.04 against 58.13 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2015.
What is the difference in paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score between Guinea-Bissau and Tanzania?
0.91, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Tanzania?
11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Tanzania rank globally for paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 147th and Tanzania ranks 145th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
185 places, 2,006 data points, 2005–2015
Last refreshed

The score for paying taxes is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, the payments, time and total tax and contribution rate for a company to comply with tax laws in an economy. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-16 studies.