Equatorial Guinea vs Eritrea: Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score
Equatorial Guinea
43.21
in 2015
Eritrea
43.49
in 2015
Equatorial Guinea rank
174th
Eritrea rank
173rd
Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 43.49 against 43.21 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.28.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 174th and Eritrea ranks 173rd of 186 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.21 | 43.06 | 0.1425 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 43.21 | 43.28 | 0.0716 | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 43.49 against 43.21 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2015.
- What is the difference in paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea?
- 0.28, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea rank globally for paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 174th and Eritrea ranks 173rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for paying taxes is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, the payments, time and total tax and contribution rate for a company to comply with tax laws in an economy. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-16 studies.