Congo vs Mauritania: Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score

Congo
30.68
in 2015
Mauritania
20.28
in 2015
Congo rank
177th
Mauritania rank
180th

Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score over time

  • Congo
  • Mauritania
0102030200520102015

How they compare

Congo currently reports 30.68 against 20.28 in Mauritania, a difference of 10.4.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.5 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 177th and Mauritania ranks 180th of 183 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Mauritania Difference Ahead
2000s 19.7 16.91 2.78 Congo
2010s 25.63 28.22 2.59 Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score, Congo or Mauritania?
Congo, at 30.68 against 20.28 in Mauritania as of 2015.
What is the difference in paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score between Congo and Mauritania?
10.4, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mauritania?
11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
How do Congo and Mauritania rank globally for paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score?
Congo ranks 177th and Mauritania ranks 180th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
185 places, 2,006 data points, 2005–2015
Last refreshed

The score for paying taxes is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, the payments, time and total tax and contribution rate for a company to comply with tax laws in an economy. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-16 studies.