Canada vs North Macedonia: Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score

Canada
93
in 2015
North Macedonia
94.17
in 2015
Canada rank
9th
North Macedonia rank
8th

Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score over time

  • Canada
  • North Macedonia
020406080100200520102015

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 94.17 against 93 in Canada, a difference of 1.17.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 9th and North Macedonia ranks 8th of 183 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2000s 84.19 72.28 11.91 Canada
2010s 93 83.99 9.01 Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score, Canada or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 94.17 against 93 in Canada as of 2015.
What is the difference in paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score between Canada and North Macedonia?
1.17, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and North Macedonia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
How do Canada and North Macedonia rank globally for paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score?
Canada ranks 9th and North Macedonia ranks 8th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
185 places, 2,006 data points, 2005–2015
Last refreshed

The score for paying taxes is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, the payments, time and total tax and contribution rate for a company to comply with tax laws in an economy. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-16 studies.