Cape Verde vs Mongolia: Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score

Cape Verde
73.36
in 2015
Mongolia
73.79
in 2015
Cape Verde rank
89th
Mongolia rank
86th

Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Mongolia
020406080200520102015

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 73.79 against 73.36 in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.43.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mongolia ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 89th and Mongolia ranks 86th of 183 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Mongolia Difference Ahead
2000s 57.36 66.34 8.99 Mongolia
2010s 72.67 72.28 0.3936 Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score, Cape Verde or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 73.79 against 73.36 in Cape Verde as of 2015.
What is the difference in paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score between Cape Verde and Mongolia?
0.43, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Mongolia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
How do Cape Verde and Mongolia rank globally for paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score?
Cape Verde ranks 89th and Mongolia ranks 86th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
185 places, 2,006 data points, 2005–2015
Last refreshed

The score for paying taxes is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, the payments, time and total tax and contribution rate for a company to comply with tax laws in an economy. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-16 studies.