Belgium vs Saint Lucia: Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score

Belgium
75.09
in 2015
Saint Lucia
75.04
in 2015
Belgium rank
81st
Saint Lucia rank
83rd

Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score over time

  • Belgium
  • Saint Lucia
020406080200520102015

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 75.09 against 75.04 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.05.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Lucia ahead.

Belgium ranks 81st and Saint Lucia ranks 83rd of 183 countries.

Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
2000s 74.37 77.07 2.69 Saint Lucia
2010s 75.46 75.72 0.2601 Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score, Belgium or Saint Lucia?
Belgium, at 75.09 against 75.04 in Saint Lucia as of 2015.
What is the difference in paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score between Belgium and Saint Lucia?
0.05, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Saint Lucia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
How do Belgium and Saint Lucia rank globally for paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score?
Belgium ranks 81st and Saint Lucia ranks 83rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
185 places, 2,006 data points, 2005–2015
Last refreshed

The score for paying taxes is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, the payments, time and total tax and contribution rate for a company to comply with tax laws in an economy. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-16 studies.