Bahamas vs East Timor: Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score

Bahamas
87.07
in 2015
East Timor
86.15
in 2015
Bahamas rank
24th
East Timor rank
26th

Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score over time

  • Bahamas
  • East Timor
020406080100200520102015

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 87.07 against 86.15 in East Timor, a difference of 0.92.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 24th and East Timor ranks 26th of 183 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 82.64 67.08 15.56 Bahamas
2010s 82.79 88.38 5.59 East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score, Bahamas or East Timor?
Bahamas, at 87.07 against 86.15 in East Timor as of 2015.
What is the difference in paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score between Bahamas and East Timor?
0.92, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and East Timor?
9 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2015.
How do Bahamas and East Timor rank globally for paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score?
Bahamas ranks 24th and East Timor ranks 26th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
185 places, 2,006 data points, 2005–2015
Last refreshed

The score for paying taxes is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, the payments, time and total tax and contribution rate for a company to comply with tax laws in an economy. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-16 studies.