Argentina vs Panama: Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score

Argentina
44.99
in 2015
Panama
48.6
in 2015
Argentina rank
166th
Panama rank
163rd

Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score over time

  • Argentina
  • Panama
1020304050200520102015

How they compare

Panama currently reports 48.6 against 44.99 in Argentina, a difference of 3.61.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Panama ahead.

Argentina ranks 166th and Panama ranks 163rd of 183 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Panama Difference Ahead
2000s 34.41 40.29 5.88 Panama
2010s 44.49 45.32 0.8221 Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score, Argentina or Panama?
Panama, at 48.6 against 44.99 in Argentina as of 2015.
What is the difference in paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score between Argentina and Panama?
3.61, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Panama?
11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
How do Argentina and Panama rank globally for paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score?
Argentina ranks 166th and Panama ranks 163rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
185 places, 2,006 data points, 2005–2015
Last refreshed

The score for paying taxes is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, the payments, time and total tax and contribution rate for a company to comply with tax laws in an economy. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-16 studies.