Argentina vs Gambia: Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score

Argentina
44.99
in 2015
Gambia
47.96
in 2015
Argentina rank
166th
Gambia rank
164th

Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score over time

  • Argentina
  • Gambia
1020304050200520102015

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 47.96 against 44.99 in Argentina, a difference of 2.97.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Gambia ahead.

Argentina ranks 166th and Gambia ranks 164th of 183 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Gambia Difference Ahead
2000s 34.41 24.82 9.59 Argentina
2010s 44.49 31.32 13.17 Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score, Argentina or Gambia?
Gambia, at 47.96 against 44.99 in Argentina as of 2015.
What is the difference in paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score between Argentina and Gambia?
2.97, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Gambia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
How do Argentina and Gambia rank globally for paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score?
Argentina ranks 166th and Gambia ranks 164th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
185 places, 2,006 data points, 2005–2015
Last refreshed

The score for paying taxes is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, the payments, time and total tax and contribution rate for a company to comply with tax laws in an economy. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-16 studies.