ALB vs COL: Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score
ALB
61.83
in 2015
COL
61.72
in 2015
ALB rank
136th
COL rank
137th
Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score over time
- ALB
- COL
How they compare
ALB currently reports 61.83 against 61.72 in COL, a difference of 0.11.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was ALB ahead.
ALB ranks 136th and COL ranks 137th of 183 countries.
ALB has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | ALB | COL | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.6 | 27.6 | 21 | ALB |
| 2010s | 58.4 | 57.89 | 0.5142 | ALB |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score, ALB or COL?
- ALB, at 61.83 against 61.72 in COL as of 2015.
- What is the difference in paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score between ALB and COL?
- 0.11, with ALB ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ALB and COL?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
- How do ALB and COL rank globally for paying taxes (db06-16 methodology) - score?
- ALB ranks 136th and COL ranks 137th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes (DB06-16 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for paying taxes is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators, the payments, time and total tax and contribution rate for a company to comply with tax laws in an economy. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-16 studies.