Ukraine vs Zimbabwe: Participatory Political Institutions Index
Ukraine
0.549
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0.55
in 2025
Ukraine rank
80th
Zimbabwe rank
79th
Participatory Political Institutions Index over time
- Ukraine
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.55 against 0.549 in Ukraine, a difference of 0.001.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 80 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Ukraine ranks 80th and Zimbabwe ranks 79th of 176 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ukraine | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 0.049 | 0.338 | 0.289 | Zimbabwe |
| 1950s | 0.049 | 0.3373 | 0.2883 | Zimbabwe |
| 1960s | 0.1659 | 0.3184 | 0.1525 | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 0.2132 | 0.302 | 0.0888 | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 0.2289 | 0.4696 | 0.2407 | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 0.4513 | 0.512 | 0.0607 | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.5596 | 0.597 | 0.0374 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.5444 | 0.603 | 0.0586 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.559 | 0.564 | 0.005 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher participatory political institutions index, Ukraine or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.55 against 0.549 in Ukraine as of 2025.
- What is the difference in participatory political institutions index between Ukraine and Zimbabwe?
- 0.001, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ukraine and Zimbabwe?
- 80 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2025.
- How do Ukraine and Zimbabwe rank globally for participatory political institutions index?
- Ukraine ranks 80th and Zimbabwe ranks 79th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Participatory Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which citizens can engage in regional and local government, civil society organizations, and direct democracy.