Laos vs Rwanda: Participatory Political Institutions Index
Laos
0.396
in 2025
Rwanda
0.391
in 2025
Laos rank
120th
Rwanda rank
122nd
Participatory Political Institutions Index over time
- Laos
- Rwanda
How they compare
Laos currently reports 0.396 against 0.391 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.005.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 110 shared years of data; in 1916 it was Rwanda ahead.
Laos ranks 120th and Rwanda ranks 122nd of 176 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Laos averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 8.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.05 | 0.094 | 0.044 | Rwanda |
| 1920s | 0.05 | 0.094 | 0.044 | Rwanda |
| 1930s | 0.05 | 0.094 | 0.044 | Rwanda |
| 1940s | 0.0577 | 0.094 | 0.0363 | Rwanda |
| 1950s | 0.1473 | 0.094 | 0.0533 | Laos |
| 1960s | 0.176 | 0.2772 | 0.1012 | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 0.2392 | 0.2264 | 0.0128 | Laos |
| 1980s | 0.327 | 0.167 | 0.16 | Laos |
| 1990s | 0.327 | 0.294 | 0.033 | Laos |
| 2000s | 0.3281 | 0.5199 | 0.1918 | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0.3514 | 0.5735 | 0.2221 | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0.3853 | 0.439 | 0.0537 | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher participatory political institutions index, Laos or Rwanda?
- Laos, at 0.396 against 0.391 in Rwanda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in participatory political institutions index between Laos and Rwanda?
- 0.005, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Rwanda?
- 110 years are reported by both, from 1916 to 2025.
- How do Laos and Rwanda rank globally for participatory political institutions index?
- Laos ranks 120th and Rwanda ranks 122nd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Participatory Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which citizens can engage in regional and local government, civil society organizations, and direct democracy.