Kazakhstan vs Libya: Participatory Political Institutions Index
Kazakhstan
0.246
in 2025
Libya
0.24
in 2025
Kazakhstan rank
144th
Libya rank
145th
Participatory Political Institutions Index over time
- Kazakhstan
- Libya
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.246 against 0.24 in Libya, a difference of 0.006.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 83 shared years of data; in 1934 it was Libya ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 144th and Libya ranks 145th of 176 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 4 and Libya in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 0.047 | 0.196 | 0.149 | Libya |
| 1940s | 0.049 | 0.196 | 0.147 | Libya |
| 1950s | 0.049 | 0.2042 | 0.1552 | Libya |
| 1960s | 0.1659 | 0.2137 | 0.0478 | Libya |
| 1970s | 0.2132 | 0.1574 | 0.0558 | Kazakhstan |
| 1980s | 0.2289 | 0.154 | 0.0749 | Kazakhstan |
| 1990s | 0.2049 | 0.154 | 0.0509 | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0.1891 | 0.1536 | 0.0355 | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0.1596 | 0.4119 | 0.2523 | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.243 | 0.3813 | 0.1383 | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher participatory political institutions index, Kazakhstan or Libya?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.246 against 0.24 in Libya as of 2025.
- What is the difference in participatory political institutions index between Kazakhstan and Libya?
- 0.006, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Libya?
- 83 years are reported by both, from 1934 to 2025.
- How do Kazakhstan and Libya rank globally for participatory political institutions index?
- Kazakhstan ranks 144th and Libya ranks 145th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Participatory Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which citizens can engage in regional and local government, civil society organizations, and direct democracy.