Croatia vs Nepal: Participatory Political Institutions Index
Croatia
0.616
in 2025
Nepal
0.615
in 2025
Croatia rank
38th
Nepal rank
41st
Participatory Political Institutions Index over time
- Croatia
- Nepal
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0.616 against 0.615 in Nepal, a difference of 0.001.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 85 shared years of data; in 1941 it was Nepal ahead.
Croatia ranks 38th and Nepal ranks 41st of 176 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 0.1411 | 0.0687 | 0.0724 | Croatia |
| 1950s | 0.224 | 0.118 | 0.106 | Croatia |
| 1960s | 0.224 | 0.1888 | 0.0352 | Croatia |
| 1970s | 0.224 | 0.1982 | 0.0258 | Croatia |
| 1980s | 0.2433 | 0.2201 | 0.0232 | Croatia |
| 1990s | 0.4671 | 0.4361 | 0.031 | Croatia |
| 2000s | 0.5504 | 0.3895 | 0.1609 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0.6549 | 0.466 | 0.1889 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0.6277 | 0.6053 | 0.0223 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher participatory political institutions index, Croatia or Nepal?
- Croatia, at 0.616 against 0.615 in Nepal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in participatory political institutions index between Croatia and Nepal?
- 0.001, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Nepal?
- 85 years are reported by both, from 1941 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Nepal rank globally for participatory political institutions index?
- Croatia ranks 38th and Nepal ranks 41st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Participatory Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which citizens can engage in regional and local government, civil society organizations, and direct democracy.