North Africa vs Sao Tome and Principe: Participation and Human Rights
Participation and Human Rights over time
- North Africa
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 65.11 against 35.23 in North Africa, a difference of 29.88.
That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.8 times North Africa's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
North Africa ranks 6th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 7th of 6 groups.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Africa | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.98 | 62.1 | 29.12 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 33.89 | 63.89 | 30 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher participation and human rights, North Africa or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 65.11 against 35.23 in North Africa as of 2011.
- What is the difference in participation and human rights between North Africa and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 29.88, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Africa and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
- How do North Africa and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for participation and human rights?
- North Africa ranks 6th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 7th of 6 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as Participation and Human Rights. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Participation: Within this sub-category the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Political Participation β extent to which citizens have relevant information and the freedom to participate in the political process. (ii) Effective Power to Govern β extent to which democratically elected leaders have the effective power to govern, or the extent of veto powers and political enclaves. (iii) Free and Fair Elections β extent to which leaders are determined by free and fair elections. (iv) Electoral Self-determination β right of citizens to freely decide their political system and leadership. (v) Free and Fair Executive Elections β integrity of executive elections.