Namibia vs South Africa: Participation and Human Rights

Namibia
69.98
in 2011
South Africa
73.31
in 2011
Namibia rank
5th
South Africa rank
3rd

Participation and Human Rights over time

  • Namibia
  • South Africa
020406080200020052011

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 73.31 against 69.98 in Namibia, a difference of 3.33.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was South Africa ahead.

Namibia ranks 5th and South Africa ranks 3rd of 52 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia South Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 72.85 74.86 2.02 South Africa
2010s 69.21 73.27 4.05 South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher participation and human rights, Namibia or South Africa?
South Africa, at 73.31 against 69.98 in Namibia as of 2011.
What is the difference in participation and human rights between Namibia and South Africa?
3.33, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and South Africa?
12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
How do Namibia and South Africa rank globally for participation and human rights?
Namibia ranks 5th and South Africa ranks 3rd of 52 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as Participation and Human Rights. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Participation and Human Rights
Source
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
58 places, 696 data points, 2000–2011
Last refreshed

Participation: Within this sub-category the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Political Participation – extent to which citizens have relevant information and the freedom to participate in the political process. (ii) Effective Power to Govern – extent to which democratically elected leaders have the effective power to govern, or the extent of veto powers and political enclaves. (iii) Free and Fair Elections – extent to which leaders are determined by free and fair elections. (iv) Electoral Self-determination – right of citizens to freely decide their political system and leadership. (v) Free and Fair Executive Elections – integrity of executive elections.