Mozambique vs Uganda: Participation and Human Rights

Mozambique
57.88
in 2011
Uganda
54.81
in 2011
Mozambique rank
16th
Uganda rank
19th

Participation and Human Rights over time

  • Mozambique
  • Uganda
0204060200020052011

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 57.88 against 54.81 in Uganda, a difference of 3.07.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.

Mozambique ranks 16th and Uganda ranks 19th of 52 countries.

Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 62.32 51.15 11.17 Mozambique
2010s 57.84 54.21 3.63 Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher participation and human rights, Mozambique or Uganda?
Mozambique, at 57.88 against 54.81 in Uganda as of 2011.
What is the difference in participation and human rights between Mozambique and Uganda?
3.07, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Uganda?
12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
How do Mozambique and Uganda rank globally for participation and human rights?
Mozambique ranks 16th and Uganda ranks 19th of 52 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as Participation and Human Rights. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Participation and Human Rights
Source
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
58 places, 696 data points, 2000–2011
Last refreshed

Participation: Within this sub-category the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Political Participation – extent to which citizens have relevant information and the freedom to participate in the political process. (ii) Effective Power to Govern – extent to which democratically elected leaders have the effective power to govern, or the extent of veto powers and political enclaves. (iii) Free and Fair Elections – extent to which leaders are determined by free and fair elections. (iv) Electoral Self-determination – right of citizens to freely decide their political system and leadership. (v) Free and Fair Executive Elections – integrity of executive elections.