Mauritius vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Participation and Human Rights
Participation and Human Rights over time
- Mauritius
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 78.25 against 49.2 in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 29.05.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.6 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 2nd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd of 52 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 77.02 | 47.76 | 29.26 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 77.62 | 48.82 | 28.8 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher participation and human rights, Mauritius or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Mauritius, at 78.25 against 49.2 in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2011.
- What is the difference in participation and human rights between Mauritius and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 29.05, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
- How do Mauritius and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for participation and human rights?
- Mauritius ranks 2nd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as Participation and Human Rights. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Participation: Within this sub-category the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Political Participation – extent to which citizens have relevant information and the freedom to participate in the political process. (ii) Effective Power to Govern – extent to which democratically elected leaders have the effective power to govern, or the extent of veto powers and political enclaves. (iii) Free and Fair Elections – extent to which leaders are determined by free and fair elections. (iv) Electoral Self-determination – right of citizens to freely decide their political system and leadership. (v) Free and Fair Executive Elections – integrity of executive elections.