Mauritania vs Sierra Leone: Participation and Human Rights

Mauritania
50.29
in 2011
Sierra Leone
54.6
in 2011
Mauritania rank
23rd
Sierra Leone rank
20th

Participation and Human Rights over time

  • Mauritania
  • Sierra Leone
0204060200020052011

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 54.6 against 50.29 in Mauritania, a difference of 4.31.

That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sierra Leone ahead.

Mauritania ranks 23rd and Sierra Leone ranks 20th of 52 countries.

Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
2000s 46.16 50.7 4.54 Sierra Leone
2010s 49.06 54.55 5.49 Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher participation and human rights, Mauritania or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 54.6 against 50.29 in Mauritania as of 2011.
What is the difference in participation and human rights between Mauritania and Sierra Leone?
4.31, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Sierra Leone?
12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
How do Mauritania and Sierra Leone rank globally for participation and human rights?
Mauritania ranks 23rd and Sierra Leone ranks 20th of 52 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as Participation and Human Rights. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Participation and Human Rights
Source
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
58 places, 696 data points, 2000–2011
Last refreshed

Participation: Within this sub-category the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Political Participation – extent to which citizens have relevant information and the freedom to participate in the political process. (ii) Effective Power to Govern – extent to which democratically elected leaders have the effective power to govern, or the extent of veto powers and political enclaves. (iii) Free and Fair Elections – extent to which leaders are determined by free and fair elections. (iv) Electoral Self-determination – right of citizens to freely decide their political system and leadership. (v) Free and Fair Executive Elections – integrity of executive elections.