Mali vs Zambia: Participation and Human Rights

Mali
60.34
in 2011
Zambia
59.07
in 2011
Mali rank
12th
Zambia rank
15th

Participation and Human Rights over time

  • Mali
  • Zambia
0204060200020052011

How they compare

Mali currently reports 60.34 against 59.07 in Zambia, a difference of 1.27.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.

Mali ranks 12th and Zambia ranks 15th of 52 countries.

Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 57.76 53.57 4.19 Mali
2010s 59.38 58.2 1.18 Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher participation and human rights, Mali or Zambia?
Mali, at 60.34 against 59.07 in Zambia as of 2011.
What is the difference in participation and human rights between Mali and Zambia?
1.27, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Zambia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
How do Mali and Zambia rank globally for participation and human rights?
Mali ranks 12th and Zambia ranks 15th of 52 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as Participation and Human Rights. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Participation and Human Rights
Source
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
58 places, 696 data points, 2000–2011
Last refreshed

Participation: Within this sub-category the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Political Participation – extent to which citizens have relevant information and the freedom to participate in the political process. (ii) Effective Power to Govern – extent to which democratically elected leaders have the effective power to govern, or the extent of veto powers and political enclaves. (iii) Free and Fair Elections – extent to which leaders are determined by free and fair elections. (iv) Electoral Self-determination – right of citizens to freely decide their political system and leadership. (v) Free and Fair Executive Elections – integrity of executive elections.