Guinea-Bissau vs Togo: Participation and Human Rights

Guinea-Bissau
40.02
in 2011
Togo
39.79
in 2011
Guinea-Bissau rank
34th
Togo rank
35th

Participation and Human Rights over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Togo
0204060200020052011

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 40.02 against 39.79 in Togo, a difference of 0.23.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 34th and Togo ranks 35th of 52 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Togo Difference Ahead
2000s 47.93 32.18 15.76 Guinea-Bissau
2010s 40.25 39.38 0.8636 Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher participation and human rights, Guinea-Bissau or Togo?
Guinea-Bissau, at 40.02 against 39.79 in Togo as of 2011.
What is the difference in participation and human rights between Guinea-Bissau and Togo?
0.23, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Togo?
12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Togo rank globally for participation and human rights?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 34th and Togo ranks 35th of 52 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as Participation and Human Rights. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Participation and Human Rights
Source
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
58 places, 696 data points, 2000–2011
Last refreshed

Participation: Within this sub-category the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Political Participation – extent to which citizens have relevant information and the freedom to participate in the political process. (ii) Effective Power to Govern – extent to which democratically elected leaders have the effective power to govern, or the extent of veto powers and political enclaves. (iii) Free and Fair Elections – extent to which leaders are determined by free and fair elections. (iv) Electoral Self-determination – right of citizens to freely decide their political system and leadership. (v) Free and Fair Executive Elections – integrity of executive elections.