Guinea-Bissau vs Nigeria: Participation and Human Rights
Participation and Human Rights over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Nigeria
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 40.02 against 38.48 in Nigeria, a difference of 1.54.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 34th and Nigeria ranks 37th of 52 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.93 | 40.43 | 7.51 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 40.25 | 37.91 | 2.33 | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher participation and human rights, Guinea-Bissau or Nigeria?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 40.02 against 38.48 in Nigeria as of 2011.
- What is the difference in participation and human rights between Guinea-Bissau and Nigeria?
- 1.54, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Nigeria?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Nigeria rank globally for participation and human rights?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 34th and Nigeria ranks 37th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as Participation and Human Rights. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Participation: Within this sub-category the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Political Participation – extent to which citizens have relevant information and the freedom to participate in the political process. (ii) Effective Power to Govern – extent to which democratically elected leaders have the effective power to govern, or the extent of veto powers and political enclaves. (iii) Free and Fair Elections – extent to which leaders are determined by free and fair elections. (iv) Electoral Self-determination – right of citizens to freely decide their political system and leadership. (v) Free and Fair Executive Elections – integrity of executive elections.