Ghana vs North Africa: Participation and Human Rights

Ghana
69.23
in 2011
North Africa
35.23
in 2011
Ghana rank
6th
North Africa rank
6th

Participation and Human Rights over time

  • Ghana
  • North Africa
020406080200020052011

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 69.23 against 35.23 in North Africa, a difference of 34.

That makes Ghana's figure about 2.0 times North Africa's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Ghana has been ahead every year.

Ghana ranks 6th and North Africa ranks 6th of 52 countries.

Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana North Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 68.22 32.98 35.24 Ghana
2010s 69.26 33.89 35.37 Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher participation and human rights, Ghana or North Africa?
Ghana, at 69.23 against 35.23 in North Africa as of 2011.
What is the difference in participation and human rights between Ghana and North Africa?
34, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and North Africa?
12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
How do Ghana and North Africa rank globally for participation and human rights?
Ghana ranks 6th and North Africa ranks 6th of 52 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as Participation and Human Rights. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Participation and Human Rights
Source
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
58 places, 696 data points, 2000–2011
Last refreshed

Participation: Within this sub-category the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Political Participation – extent to which citizens have relevant information and the freedom to participate in the political process. (ii) Effective Power to Govern – extent to which democratically elected leaders have the effective power to govern, or the extent of veto powers and political enclaves. (iii) Free and Fair Elections – extent to which leaders are determined by free and fair elections. (iv) Electoral Self-determination – right of citizens to freely decide their political system and leadership. (v) Free and Fair Executive Elections – integrity of executive elections.