Eswatini vs Libya: Participation and Human Rights
Participation and Human Rights over time
- Eswatini
- Libya
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 29.73 against 22.63 in Libya, a difference of 7.1.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.3 times Libya's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 47th and Libya ranks 50th of 52 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.42 | 17.76 | 9.66 | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 29.75 | 21.05 | 8.7 | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher participation and human rights, Eswatini or Libya?
- Eswatini, at 29.73 against 22.63 in Libya as of 2011.
- What is the difference in participation and human rights between Eswatini and Libya?
- 7.1, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Libya?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
- How do Eswatini and Libya rank globally for participation and human rights?
- Eswatini ranks 47th and Libya ranks 50th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as Participation and Human Rights. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Participation: Within this sub-category the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Political Participation β extent to which citizens have relevant information and the freedom to participate in the political process. (ii) Effective Power to Govern β extent to which democratically elected leaders have the effective power to govern, or the extent of veto powers and political enclaves. (iii) Free and Fair Elections β extent to which leaders are determined by free and fair elections. (iv) Electoral Self-determination β right of citizens to freely decide their political system and leadership. (v) Free and Fair Executive Elections β integrity of executive elections.