Eritrea vs Somalia: Participation and Human Rights
Participation and Human Rights over time
- Eritrea
- Somalia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 21.76 against 10.02 in Somalia, a difference of 11.74.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 2.2 times Somalia's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 51st and Somalia ranks 52nd of 52 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Somalia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.67 | 11.73 | 13.94 | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 21.78 | 10.62 | 11.16 | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher participation and human rights, Eritrea or Somalia?
- Eritrea, at 21.76 against 10.02 in Somalia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in participation and human rights between Eritrea and Somalia?
- 11.74, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Somalia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Somalia rank globally for participation and human rights?
- Eritrea ranks 51st and Somalia ranks 52nd of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as Participation and Human Rights. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Participation: Within this sub-category the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Political Participation – extent to which citizens have relevant information and the freedom to participate in the political process. (ii) Effective Power to Govern – extent to which democratically elected leaders have the effective power to govern, or the extent of veto powers and political enclaves. (iii) Free and Fair Elections – extent to which leaders are determined by free and fair elections. (iv) Electoral Self-determination – right of citizens to freely decide their political system and leadership. (v) Free and Fair Executive Elections – integrity of executive elections.