Equatorial Guinea vs Somalia: Participation and Human Rights
Participation and Human Rights over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Somalia
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 24.74 against 10.02 in Somalia, a difference of 14.72.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 2.5 times Somalia's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 49th and Somalia ranks 52nd of 52 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Somalia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.87 | 11.73 | 8.14 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 23.31 | 10.62 | 12.69 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher participation and human rights, Equatorial Guinea or Somalia?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 24.74 against 10.02 in Somalia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in participation and human rights between Equatorial Guinea and Somalia?
- 14.72, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Somalia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Somalia rank globally for participation and human rights?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 49th and Somalia ranks 52nd of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as Participation and Human Rights. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Participation: Within this sub-category the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Political Participation – extent to which citizens have relevant information and the freedom to participate in the political process. (ii) Effective Power to Govern – extent to which democratically elected leaders have the effective power to govern, or the extent of veto powers and political enclaves. (iii) Free and Fair Elections – extent to which leaders are determined by free and fair elections. (iv) Electoral Self-determination – right of citizens to freely decide their political system and leadership. (v) Free and Fair Executive Elections – integrity of executive elections.