Egypt vs Equatorial Guinea: Participation and Human Rights

Egypt
31.1
in 2011
Equatorial Guinea
24.74
in 2011
Egypt rank
46th
Equatorial Guinea rank
49th

Participation and Human Rights over time

  • Egypt
  • Equatorial Guinea
010203040200020052011

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 31.1 against 24.74 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 6.36.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.3 times Equatorial Guinea's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.

Egypt ranks 46th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 49th of 52 countries.

Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 32.56 19.87 12.69 Egypt
2010s 31.99 23.31 8.68 Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher participation and human rights, Egypt or Equatorial Guinea?
Egypt, at 31.1 against 24.74 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2011.
What is the difference in participation and human rights between Egypt and Equatorial Guinea?
6.36, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Equatorial Guinea?
12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
How do Egypt and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for participation and human rights?
Egypt ranks 46th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 49th of 52 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as Participation and Human Rights. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Participation and Human Rights
Source
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
58 places, 696 data points, 2000–2011
Last refreshed

Participation: Within this sub-category the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Political Participation – extent to which citizens have relevant information and the freedom to participate in the political process. (ii) Effective Power to Govern – extent to which democratically elected leaders have the effective power to govern, or the extent of veto powers and political enclaves. (iii) Free and Fair Elections – extent to which leaders are determined by free and fair elections. (iv) Electoral Self-determination – right of citizens to freely decide their political system and leadership. (v) Free and Fair Executive Elections – integrity of executive elections.