Djibouti vs Ethiopia: Participation and Human Rights

Djibouti
37.95
in 2011
Ethiopia
36.31
in 2011
Djibouti rank
38th
Ethiopia rank
39th

Participation and Human Rights over time

  • Djibouti
  • Ethiopia
010203040200020052011

How they compare

Djibouti currently reports 37.95 against 36.31 in Ethiopia, a difference of 1.64.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Ethiopia ahead.

Djibouti ranks 38th and Ethiopia ranks 39th of 52 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 1 and Ethiopia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Ethiopia Difference Ahead
2000s 34.2 37.28 3.08 Ethiopia
2010s 37.33 35.48 1.84 Djibouti

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher participation and human rights, Djibouti or Ethiopia?
Djibouti, at 37.95 against 36.31 in Ethiopia as of 2011.
What is the difference in participation and human rights between Djibouti and Ethiopia?
1.64, with Djibouti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Ethiopia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
How do Djibouti and Ethiopia rank globally for participation and human rights?
Djibouti ranks 38th and Ethiopia ranks 39th of 52 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as Participation and Human Rights. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Participation and Human Rights
Source
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
58 places, 696 data points, 2000–2011
Last refreshed

Participation: Within this sub-category the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Political Participation – extent to which citizens have relevant information and the freedom to participate in the political process. (ii) Effective Power to Govern – extent to which democratically elected leaders have the effective power to govern, or the extent of veto powers and political enclaves. (iii) Free and Fair Elections – extent to which leaders are determined by free and fair elections. (iv) Electoral Self-determination – right of citizens to freely decide their political system and leadership. (v) Free and Fair Executive Elections – integrity of executive elections.